Adair v. Rose Law Firm
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
This case is before the Court on the Petition of the Inspector General of the Resolu tion Trust Corporation For Summary Enforcement of an Administrative Subpoena Duces Tecum and the Motion of Respondent Rose Law Firm for a Protective Order. The Court has determined that the subpoena should be enforced, as narrowed by the Peti-, tion and the representations of counsel that Rose may produce a list of Rose’s clients for the relevant period and need not produce the other client-identifying documents originally sought. In view of the revised…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- North Haven Board of Education v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Federal Communications Commission v. SchreiberSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Linde Thomson Langworthy Kohn & Van Dyke, P.C. v. Resolution Trust CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
- Exxon Corporation v. Federal Trade Commission Kerr-Mcgee Corporation v. Federal Trade Commission Union Carbide Corporation v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- Resolution Trust Corporation v. William L. Walde, Resolution Trust Corporation v. Solomon F. Schick, John C. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Neighborhood Assistance Corporation of America (Naca) v. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Alfa International Seafood, Inc. v. PritzkerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Truckers United for Safety v. MeadDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
- United States v. Hunton & WilliamsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1997
- Inspector General of United States Department of Agriculture v. GlennCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.