Legal Opinion
United States v. Hunton & Williams
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 3, 1997No. Misc. Action 95-459 (RMU)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Granting Petitioners’ Motion to Enforce the Subpoena Duces Tecum and Ordering the Parties to Enter Into a Confidentiality Agreement
URBINA, District Judge.
I. Introduction
This matter comes before the court upon the United States’ and the Office of the Inspector General of the Resolution Trust Corporation’s (OIG-RTC) motion to enforce a subpoena duces tecum. 1 The RTC retained Hunton & Williams (H & W), a private law firm, to provide it with legal services on a number of matters relating to the management of several failed savings and loans (S & L) institutions. The…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Shillitani v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. ZolinSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Endicott Johnson Corp. v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. McGraw-Hill CompaniesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Truckers United for Safety v. MeadDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
- Truckers United for Safety v. MeadDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- United States of America v. California Rural Legal Assistance, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- United States v. Institute for College Access & SuccessDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.