Legal Opinion

William George Reinke, Jr. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 22, 1969No. 22564PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMLIN, Circuit Judge:

William Reinke was convicted in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona of interstate transportation of a stolen motor vehicle, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2312 (the Dyer Act). This court has jurisdiction over the appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

Appellant’s sole contention on this appeal is that the trial judge erred by permitting an FBI agent, Kenneth Pless, to testify to certain statements made to him by the appellant after the appellant had been arrested. On January 3, 1967, appellant appeared with appointed counsel at a preliminary hearing before a…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. William Joseph Coughlan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. United States v. Winston Valdemar SpringerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
  2. Berkson v. Gogo LLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
  3. United States v. McOmberUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  4. United States v. William Darrell Halbert, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  5. United States v. Edward Grady PartinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API