Legal Opinion

William Joseph Coughlan v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 20, 1968No. 21626_1PublishedCited by 111 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant was convicted of aiding and abetting in the robbery of a federally insured bank.1

Trial was to the district judge, jury having been properly waived. The conviction depended on an oral confession, evidence of which was received at the trial. The oral statements involved were taken by police officers who interviewed the appellant in a jail interview room. The court held a full evidentiary hearing to determine the voluntariness of the extra-judicial admissions. Suffice to say, the record makes it abundant*372ly clear that the accused was fully and fairly advised of and understood his…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

3Cited by111 opinions

  1. Brewer v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. State v. RichmondArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  3. United States v. Winston Valdemar SpringerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
  4. United States v. Michael Lemonakis, United States of America v. Paul EntenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  5. United States v. Billy Gene ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973

106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API