Legal Opinion
United States v. William Darrell Halbert, (Two Cases)
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 7, 1970No. 25704, 25761PublishedCited by 88 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES M. CARTER, Circuit Judge.
The district court granted Halbert’s motion to suppress a confession to an FBI agent, relying on 18 U.S.C. § 3501 (c). The government took an interlocutory appeal under 18 U.S.C. § 3731. The major question presented is the proper construction of 18 U.S.C. § 3501, from Title II of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, P.L. 90-351, 90th Congress, June 19, 1968, 82 Stat. 197, on which, as yet, there is little case law. We reverse.
After the United States filed its appeal, Halbert filed a notice of appeal, purporting to be a cross appeal, ’■#…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Mallory v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Upshaw v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by88 opinions
- Government of Virgin Islands v. GereauCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jeffrey Howard VAN POYCK, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Jeffrey A. BarlowCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Pierre Fouche, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- State v. ArnettArizona Supreme Court · 1978
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.