Legal Opinion

Johns v. Security Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 7, 1934No. 23602PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStjtton, J.

1. The award in this ease is -not a statutory one, as contended by counsel for the plaintiff in error. The fire-insurance policy sued on provided that if, upon loss, the parties could not agree to the amount thereof, they could enter into an agreement to submit the same to appraisers. This “agreement for submission to appraisers” provided that 'two appraisers should be appointed, one by the insured and the other by the insurer, and that they should select an umpire, who should act in ease the appraisers disagreed as to the amount of loss. The agreement that the appraisement provided for…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Walton Guano Co. v. CopelanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Eberhardt v. Federal InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  3. Manget Realty Co. v. Carolina Realty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1929
  4. Alliance Insurance v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
  5. Crane v. BarrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1873

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Luis Ríos v. Puerto Rico Cement Corp.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1946
  2. Gramling v. Food MacHinery and Chemical Corp.District Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1957
  3. PACIFIC NATIONAL FIRE &C. CO. v. BeaversCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  4. Jordan v. General Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  5. Palatine Insurance Co. v. GillelandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API