Legal Opinion
Gramling v. Food MacHinery and Chemical Corp.
District Court, W.D. South Carolina
Decided June 19, 1957No. Civ. A. 1997PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WYCHE, Chief Judge.
This action was commenced in July, 1956 for the recovery of $187,500 for damage to several peach orchards, alleged to have been caused by the application of spray materials purchased from defendant.
The case was set for trial at the October, 1956, term of court in Spartan-burg, but was continued, upon defend ant’s motion, in order to allow it more time for discovery procedure.
The case was thereafter set for trial at the succeeding April, 1957, term. After it had been called for trial and the jury selected and sworn, the parties entered into a compromise agreement which…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Wilko v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- American Almond Products Co. v. Consolidated Pecan Sales Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Karppinen v. Karl Kiefer MacHine Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Bower v. Eastern Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
- Karthaus v. Yllas Y FerrerSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Grudem Brothers Co. v. Great Western Piping Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Reichman v. Creative Real Estate Consultants, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1979
- Riverton Valley Electric Ass'n v. Pacific Power & Light Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1964
- Trident Technical College v. Lucas & Stubbs, Ltd.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
- Aerojet-General Corp. v. American Arbitration AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.