Legal Opinion
Onstott v. Equinox Gold Coast, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided November 12, 2020No. 1:18-cv-04642Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION RICK ONSTOTT, Plaintiff, Case No. 18-cv-4642 v. Judge Mary M. Rowland EQUINOX GOLD COAST, INC. D/B/A EQUINOX FITNESS CLUB, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Rick Onstott claims that his former employer, Equinox, discriminated against him based on his disability and discharged him in retaliation for reporting discrimination and harassment. Equinox has moved for summary judgment. For the reasons stated below, Equinox’s motion for summary judgment [70] is granted. SUMMARY JUDGMENT STANDARD Summary…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Henry Ortiz v. Werner Enterprises, IncorporatCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- Skiba v. Ill. Cent. R.R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Boss v. CastroCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.