Legal Opinion

Branham v. State

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1928No. Criminal No. 672PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, C. J.

— On May 17th, 1927, defendant was convicted of violating section 249 of the Penal Code of 1913, reading as follows:

“A parent who willfully omits, without lawful excuse, to furnish necessary food, clothing, shelter or medical attendance for Ms or her minor child is guilty of a felony.”

The information was in effect and substance couched in the language of the statute, the dereliction charged being the wilful omission, without legal excuse, on or about January 15th, 1927, to furnish necessary food, clothing, shelter, and medical attendance for his minor children Marietta, Albert and Nellie…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. . PiersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. State v. MoranSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
  3. State v. WallerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  4. People v. WallachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  5. State v. BessUtah Supreme Court · 1913

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-5209 & No. JS-4963Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  2. In Re the Appeal in Cochise County Juvenile Action No. 5666-JArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Gray v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. Loveland v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Redewill v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1934

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API