Legal Opinion

State v. Moran

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 1, 1923PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurpee, J.

There was no error in denying the motions or overruling the demurrer which attacked the sufficiency of the information. The criminal offense of unlawfully neglecting or refusing to support wife or child was created by statute. In this State it is a well-settled general rule that in an information charging such an offense it is sufficient to describe the offense in the words of the statute. If the accused in any such prosecution would insist upon greater particularity, it is for him to show that from the obvious intention of the legislature or because of known principles of law his case falls…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. FerroneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
  2. State v. FerroneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
  3. State v. SchweitzerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1889
  4. Scovill v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1858
  5. Commonwealth v. AckerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. State v. UbaldiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. Nelson v. SeilerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
  3. Valante v. ValanteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  4. Willie Lee Stewart v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
  5. Craig v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API