Loveland v. State of Arizona
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
NILES, Superior Judge.
The appellants, Eddie Loveland and Kathryn Loveland, were convicted in the superior court of Maricopa county by the verdict of a jury of the offense of contributing to the delinquency of Dora Ragsdale, a female child of the age of fourteen years. Woodrow Morton, charged jointly with the said appellants with the same offense, entered a plea of guilty. This appeal is from the judgment prononneed upon the verdict against the appellants.
The charging part of the information is in the following language:
“The said Eddie Loveland, Kathryn Loveland and Daniel Woodrow Morton on or…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. REESESupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas (No. 1)Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Fox v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Ex parte JacksonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1885
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Adamson v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. HodgesOregon Supreme Court · 1969
- Duhame v. State Tax CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1947
- State v. McKinleyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949
- Earhart v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1947
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.