Morse v. Hinckley
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Edward A. Belcher, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, J.
The action was commenced by George P. Goff, deceased, December 5, 1896. It is alleged in his complaint that in October, 1885, said defendant, her name then being Florence Blythe, by her guardian, James Crisp Perry, filed her petition in the matter of the estate of Thomas H. Blythe, deceased, in the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco, under section 1664 of the Code of Civil Procedure, wherein she claimed and asserted that she was the daughter and sole heir of Thomas H. Blythe, deceased, and prayed to be so adjudged; that on the twenty-second day of October, 1890, said…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hunt v. MaldonadoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Fish v. McCarthyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Guy v. Dü UpreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Kendall v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- De La Montagnie v. Union InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Golden Gate Undertaking Co. v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- County of Los Angeles v. WinansCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
- Andrus v. BlazzardUtah Supreme Court · 1901
- Schram v. PooleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
- Tasker v. CochraneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.