Legal Opinion

Hunt v. Maldonado

California Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1891No. 14350PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Temple, C.

— Appeal on judgment roll from judgment on demurrer.

The demurrer was properly sustained. The action is to recover an attorney’s fee for services rendered to the guardian of a minor in pursuance of a written contract. The action is against the minor. If the guardian made a valid contract with the attorney, he may be held liable, and if he pays it, and the probate court shall deem the expenditure reasonable, and necessary to protect the interests of the ward, it may be allowed from the ward’s-estate. But it is an expense incurred by the guardian in the performance of his duties, for…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Golden Gate Undertaking Co. v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Andrus v. BlazzardUtah Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Lothrop v. DuffieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Davidson v. WamplerMontana Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Schram v. PooleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API