Legal Opinion
Tasker v. Cochrane
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 18, 1928No. Docket No. 3573PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
This is an appeal by the plaintiff from an order of the superior court granting a new trial after judgment had been rendered in favor of the plaintiff, based upon the verdict of the jury.
The action was prosecuted by the plaintiff as the assignee of Messrs. Janeway, Beach, and Pratt, attorneys at law of Los Angeles, to recover the sum of $6,000 alleged to be the reasonable value of legal services rendered the defendant, and also to recover the further sum of $1,500.30, moneys alleged to have been paid out and advanced by said attorneys for and on behalf of the defendant.
The answer of the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Zibbell v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Cooley v. Miller & LuxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Griffey v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1922
- Doolin v. Omnibus Cable Co.California Supreme Court · 1899
- Meinberg v. JordanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Ripley v. PappadopoulosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Pope v. PopeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Weaver v. Shell Oil Co. of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Lucerne Country Club v. BealCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Lewis v. Southern California Edison Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.