Legal Opinion
Hartline v. Astrue
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 31, 2009No. Civil Action 06-219 (CKK)PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.
Plaintiff Deena Hartline brings this action seeking review of Defendant’s final administrative decision denying her claim for Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”) and .Supplemental Security Income Benefits (“SSIB”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Pending before the Court are Plaintiffs Motion for Judgment of Reversal and Defendant’s Motion for Judgment of Affirmance. After reviewing the Parties’ briefs, the administrative record, and the relevant case law, the Court shall DENY [7] Plaintiffs Motion for Judgment of Reversal and GRANT…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Jackie L. HAYS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis W. SULLIVAN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
- Butler, Joan S. v. Barnhart, Jo Anne B.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Rose E. Brown v. Otis R. Bowen, Secretary, Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- Florida Municipal Power Agency v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Pinkney v. AstrueDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Cunningham v. ColvinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Goodman v. ColvinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Turner v. AstrueDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Clark v. AstrueDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.