Legal Opinion

Petersen v. Taylor

California Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1893No. 15,116PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from Superior Court, City and County of San Francisco; J. P. Hoge, Judge. Action by one Petersen against Jos. W. Taylor to recover money alleged to have been received by defendant for plaintiff’s use. From a judgment in defendant’s favor, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.

This is an action to recover the sum of $780 claimed to be due plaintiff on two causes of action; the first is for $125 alleged to have been received by the defendant from one Calvert for the use and benefit of plaintiff, and the *337other is for $655, which it is alleged the defendant holds for plaintiff as assignee of B. & B. Bonnett, under a certificate of which the following is a copy:

“This is to certify that I have the sum of $655.00 collected from the city and county of San Francisco in the suits of B. Bonnett and C. H. Parker vs. The City and County of San Francisco, claimed by Blie…

2Cases cited1 opinion

Sloan v. DigginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by7 opinions

Moore v. CoppCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
Pettengill v. BlackmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1917
Carpenter v. ShinnersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
Newsom v. WoollacottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
Carr v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.