Legal Opinion
Spearman v. Williams
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 15, 1966No. 41717PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVISON, Justice.
This is an original action in this court by C. H. Spearman, Jr., (plaintiff) for a writ of mandamus ordering Carl Williams, Director of State Finance (defendant) to audit and allow plaintiff’s claim for office and travel expense for the latter part of July, 1965. The defendant disallowed the claim on advice of the Attorney General.
The plaintiff was and is a member of the House of Representatives of the State of Oklahoma. Plaintiff is a member of the State Legislative Council for the reason that pursuant to 74 O.S.1961, § 451, all members of the House of Representatives are…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Application of Oklahoma Capitol Improvement Auth.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- Tate v. LoganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- State ex rel. Payne v. ReevesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1921
- Manning, Commissioner of Finance v. SimsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948
- Eberle v. NielsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1957
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Fair School Finance Council of Oklahoma, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- State Ex Rel. Edmondson v. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Tax Commission v. DaxonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Breeden v. NighSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
- Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. Parkhill Restaurants, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.