Legal Opinion

O'Brien v. Gray, Admr.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 2, 1935No. Appeal, 42PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldrige, J.,

An action of trespass was brought by Thomas O’Brien against Silas A. Gray, administrator of the Estate of Harry W. Gray, deceased, to recover for injuries sustained on August 8, 1931, while riding in a car owned and driven by Gray. Owing to the death of Gray, the court below properly sustained objection to the testimony of the plaintiff, the only eye-witness, as to the circumstances of the accident. See Lockard v. Vare, 230 Pa. 591, 79 A. 802.

On the day in question, Harry W. Gray, in company with O’Brien, was motoring from Philadelphia to Mt. Gretna. They were followed…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Galbraith v. BuschNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  2. Shafer v. Lacock, Hawthorn & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  3. Durning v. HymanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  4. Knox v. SimmermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  5. Murray v. FrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ravis v. ShehulskieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Schell v. Miller North Broad Storage Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Flowers v. Dolan, Admrx.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  4. Clark v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  5. Gaul v. General Utilities Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API