Legal Opinion

Clark v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 27, 1944No. Appeal, 163PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Reno, J.,

This is trespass to recover for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff when he was struck by appellant’s motor bus. At the close of plaintiff’s testimony appellant’s point for binding instructions was refused, as was a subsequent motion for judgment n. o. v. after a verdict had been returned in plaintiff’s favor. This appeal disputes that the record exhibits evidence from which the jury could have found that the accident resulted from the operation of the bus in a negligent manner. In view of the verdict, the testimony must be read in the light most favorable to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lessig v. Reading Transit & Light Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Bailey v. C. Lewis Lavine, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Ross v. RiffleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. Reardon v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  5. Long v. Pennsylvania Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Burke v. ScottSupreme Court of Virginia · 1951
  2. Neff v. FirthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  3. Commonwealth v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Damulewicz v. Kozeniewski, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1957
  5. Seader v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API