Legal Opinion

Stonemetz Printers' Machinery Co. v. Brown Folding-Mach. Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania

Decided July 17, 1891PublishedCited by 12 opinions

In Equity.

1Opinion of the CourtReed, J.

The bill in this case alleged interference, and prayed relief under section 4918. It also alleged infringement by defendant, and prayed relief upon that ground as well. A demurrer was filed to the bill because, as claimed by the defendant, there was a misjoinder of causes of action, which, following the decisions of other circuit courts, this court overruled. The defendant then filed its answer, and subsequently filed a cross-bill, alleging infringement by the plaintiff of defendant’s patents, and praying for appropriate relief. By arrangement between counsel, the cross-bill was permitted to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ayres v. CarverSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  2. Ex Parte Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Hammond v. HawsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania · 1801
  4. Rowan v. Sharps' Rifle Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1865
  5. Rubber Co. v. GoodyearSupreme Court of the United States · 1870

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Stuart v. HaydenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1895
  2. Electric Boat Co. v. Lake Torpedo Boat Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1914
  3. Hanna v. HopeOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Marconi Wireless Telegraph Co. of America v. National Electric Signaling Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1913
  5. Terry Steam Turbine Co. v. B. F. Sturtevant Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1913

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API