Legal Opinion
Norris Et Ux. v. Eikenberry
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided October 16, 1931PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] This is a case in which vendors as complainants, seek to foreclose a contract for the sale of real estate. However, the bill of complaint alleges:
"That on account of defendant's failure and refusal to pay the amount due complainants or to otherwise comply with the terms and conditions of said agreement on his part to be performed, your complainants have exercised their option to declare said contract forfeited as provided for in said written agreement."
The…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Liberty Oil Co. v. Condon National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- American Mills Co. v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Lovett and Lovett v. LovettSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
- Sunflower Oil Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Gentry-Futch Co. v. GentrySupreme Court of Florida · 1925
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Masser v. the London Operating Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1932
- Dantzler Lumber & Export Co. v. Columbia Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1934
- Rigot v. BucciSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
- McCrory Stores Corp. v. TunnicliffeSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
- Doolittle v. Fruehauf CorporationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.