Legal Opinion

People v. Norcott

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 16, 2004PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Friedman, J.

The primary question on this appeal, involving a robbery that resulted in a vicious murder, is whether the trial court committed reversible error when it precluded defense counsel from eliciting testimony that was intended to show that the prosecution’s main witness had a motive to lie to implicate defendant in the crime. We find that we need not determine whether the challenged ruling was erroneous because the record before us makes it clear, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the witness’s motive to lie was readily apparent to the jury, and, therefore, the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Fahy v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Norcott Corby v. Dale Artus, et anoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
  2. People v. SotoNew York Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Corby v. ArtusDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  4. Degree v. CoreyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024
  5. People v. CorbyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API