People v. Norcott
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Friedman, J.
The primary question on this appeal, involving a robbery that resulted in a vicious murder, is whether the trial court committed reversible error when it precluded defense counsel from eliciting testimony that was intended to show that the prosecution’s main witness had a motive to lie to implicate defendant in the crime. We find that we need not determine whether the challenged ruling was erroneous because the record before us makes it clear, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the witness’s motive to lie was readily apparent to the jury, and, therefore, the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Fahy v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Norcott Corby v. Dale Artus, et anoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- People v. SotoNew York Supreme Court · 2005
- Corby v. ArtusDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Degree v. CoreyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024
- People v. CorbyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019