Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Farmer v. Haas

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 20, 1940No. 1 Div. 113PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOULDIN, Justice.

Appellant proceeded by mandamus in the Circuit Court of Mobile County to require respondent to draw a warrant for the salary alleged to be due petitioner for serving as bailiff in the Circuit Court of Mobile County.

In a former proceeding of like kind appellant claimed a salary of $200 per month under the Act of August 25, 1939, Acts 1939, p. 424.

It was not claimed that petitioner was appointed bailiff by one of the judges of the Circuit Court of Mobile county, but proceeded on the theory that above statute, amendatory of § 6717 of the Code, in so far" as it vested the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Farmer v. HaasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  2. Ward v. State Ex Rel. GoldsmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  3. State Ex Rel. Farmer v. HaasAlabama Court of Appeals · 1940

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. ElliottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  2. Taylor v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  3. In Re Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  4. State Ex Rel. Harrington v. RandleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API