Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Farmer v. Haas

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 23, 1940No. 1 Div. 365PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The questions certified to this Court by the Court of Appeals, under the statute, as constitutional questions, are: “Is the Act of the Legislature, No. 261 (H. 461) approved August 25, 1939 (in pamphlet form and hereto attached for your convenience) violative of Section 45 of the Constitution 1901 ? Ancillary thereto, are the following acts of the Legislature. Towit: Act (No. 80-H. 206) approved March 1, 1939 (Bound form, p. 112); Genl. Acts of Alabama, 1931, pp. 66-67; and Genl.Acts (Ala.) 1927, p. 440.”

The petition is correctly directed against the president of the board of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ballentyne v. WickershamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  2. Ex parte CowertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  3. State ex rel. Troy v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  4. Jefferson County v. BusbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  5. Butner v. BoifeuilletSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Beck v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  2. Newton v. City of TuscaloosaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  3. Wilkins v. WoolfSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  4. Cook v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  5. Taylor v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API