Legal Opinion
State v. Elliott
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided March 1, 1945No. 6 Div. 245PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMPSON, Justice.
This court is without jurisdiction to entertain the appeal and the motion to dismiss it must be sustained.
The proceedings giving rise to the appeal were transacted in the probate court under authority of Act No. 324, General Acts 1943, page 308, Code 1940, Tit. 61 § 216, providing for the determination of the validity of disputed claims filed against solvent estates.
This act is an amendment of § 216, Title 61, Code of 1940, and provides that from a judgment rendered by a probate court declaring as to the validity of such disputed claim “either party may within thirty days…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- City of Birmingham v. Southern Express Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1909
- Barrington v. BarringtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Downing v. City of RussellvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
- Herring v. GriffinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- First Nat. Bank of Birmingham v. JaffeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Ray v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
- Clary v. CasselsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
- Russell v. RussellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- Wright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1986
- Geter v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1956
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.