Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 28, 1957No. 3 Div. 759PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMPSON, Justice.

This appeal brings under review the constitutionality of § 260, Title 7, Code of 1940, as amended. The amending act is No. 74, General Acts of Alabama, 1953, Vol. I, p. 103.

The amendatory act, hereafter quoted, is in material respects similar to old § 260, prior to the amendment, except with the added proviso, which we will italicize, relative to ascertaining the plaintiff’s damages without a jury where the defendant is in default and the plaintiff had originally demanded a jury.

Act No. 74, now codified as § 260 of the Code, 1955 Cum.Pocket Parts, pp. 64-65, provides:

“An Act
“R…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Alabama State Federation of Labor v. McAdorySupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  2. Ballentyne v. WickershamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  3. Yeilding v. State Ex Rel. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  4. Norton v. LuskSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  5. Kendrick v. BoydSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Knight v. West Alabama Environmental Improvement AuthoritySupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
  2. BF Goodrich Company v. ButlerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1975
  3. Ex Parte McCurleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  4. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  5. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API