Legal Opinion
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Caldrello
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 25, 2002No. AC 20144PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FOTI, J.
The defendants Joseph M. Caldrello and Sandra V. Caldrello1 appeal from the trial court’s judgment of strict foreclosure. On appeal, the defendants argue that the court improperly (1) opened the judgment of nonsuit more than twenty months after it had been rendered, (2) allowed the plaintiff, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), to introduce certain evidence and the testimony of a witness, which had not been disclosed to the defendants until the eve of trial, and (3) failed to adjust the verdict for the undisputed unclean hands of the FDIC. We affirm the judgment…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hamm v. TaylorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Kim v. MagnottaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Opoku v. GrantConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Habura v. KochanowiczConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Tyler E. Lyman, Inc. v. LodriniConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Johnson v. Atlantic Health Services, P.C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Misata v. Con-Way Transportation Services, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Sheiman v. SheimanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Caldrello Et Ux. v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. CaldrelloConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.