Legal Opinion

Sheiman v. Sheiman

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided September 10, 2002No. AC 21515PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WEST, J.

The defendant, Stuart M. Sheiman, appeals from the judgment of the trial court modifying the custody of the parties’ minor child. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly (1) failed to provide him with a fair hearing with regard to the rules of evidence and trial practice, (2) granted the plaintiffs motion to modify custody without finding a material change in the circumstances and conditions of the parties, (3) denied the defendant’s motion to strike the plaintiffs motion to modify custody, (4) granted the oral motion in limine of the minor child’s counsel in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ireland v. IrelandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  2. Schult v. SchultSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  3. Barasso v. Rear Still Hill Road, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  4. State v. HairConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  5. State v. HairSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ambrogio v. Beaver Road AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  2. Zirinsky v. ZirinskyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  3. Doe v. RapoportConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  4. Vanguard Engineering, Inc. v. AndersonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API