Fite v. Miller
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] This suit was instituted against the defendant for damages alleged to be due the plaintiff because of the defendant's failure to comply with his unconditional contractual obligation to drill a well to a certain depth in search of oil and gas under a mineral lease which the parties owned jointly. It is stated in the petition that in…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ardizonne v. ArcherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Guardian Trust Co. v. BrothersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
- Brown v. Homestake Exploration Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1934
- Julian Petroleum Corporation v. Courtney Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
- Fite v. MillerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Apache Bohai Corp. LDC v. Texaco China BVCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- Cockburn v. O'MEARACourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
- Fisher v. HamptonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Fogle v. FeazelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
- Lancaster v. Petroleum Corp. of DelawareLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.