Fogle v. Feazel
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
ODOM, Justice.
The plaintiff. Fogle executed a mineral lease in favor of the defendant Feazel covering the NW % of the NW of Section 10, Township 17 North, Range 9 West, in Webster Parish. The lease contract was dated August 29, 1940, and the primary term of the lease was four and one-half months from its date. The lease contract contained the usual stipulation that, in case minerals of' any kind were produced from the leased premises, the lease should continue as long as minerals were produced from the land -in paying quantities.
The lease contract contained the following stipulation: “Lessee…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Murphy Oil Co. v. BurnetCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
- Fite v. MillerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
- Covington Oil Co. v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Continental Oil Co. v. Fisher Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
- Fite v. MillerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Wainwright v. FontenotSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
- McGee v. AC AND S, INC.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2006
- Willis v. Noble Drilling (US), Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
- Jones v. Capitol Enterprises, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
- Fie, LLC v. New Jax Condo Ass'n, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.