Legal Opinion

Denton v. Fyfe

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 10, 1902No. 11979PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error from Doniphan district court; H. M. Jackson, judge pro 'tem.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

This was an action of partition brought in the court below by one tenant in common against her cotenants. The real estate in controversy con*2sists of several tracts of land which, at the commencement of the action, were in the possession of defendants below. The petition contains no demand for possession. The question arises on these facts whether the action can be maintained. In Scarborough v. Smith, 18 Kan. 399, it was held that in such actions there may properly be joined a claim for possession. The question presented seems not to have been…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Weston v. . StoddardNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Scarborough v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  3. Estes v. NellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
  4. Hutson v. HutsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
  5. London v. OverbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1882

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Howard v. CarterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  2. Chouteau v. ChouteauSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Gordon v. MunnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  4. Martin v. BatteySupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  5. Chandler v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API