Legal Opinion

Martin v. Battey

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 6, 1912No. 17,701PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from Jewell district court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

This was an action by the appellants, Frank L. Martin and Florence L. Sawyer, to quiet their title to a half-section of land situated in Jewell county. They alleged that they held the legal title, in fee simple and that Galen S. Battey and Galen S. Battey, jr., a minor, claimed some interest in the land and had represented to others that they had an interest in the land adverse to appellants, thus slandering the title and preventing appellants from making a sale of the land, but that appellees’ claim of title was illegally made and…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Washburn v. Van SteenwykSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  2. Mayor of Nashville v. WebbTennessee Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Ophir Silver Mining Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Medill v. SnyderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899
  5. Neal v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Bell v. BellArizona Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Banbury v. BrailsfordIdaho Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Dougan, Administratrix v. McGrewSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  4. Suter Bros. v. HebertSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  5. Atler v. StolzNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1934

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API