Howard v. Carter
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Leavenworth district court; James H. Gillpatrick, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Cunningham, J.:
The defendants in error object to the consideration of this suit upon its merits for the reason that the court has no jurisdiction. This arises upon the claim that the case was not made in accordance with the provisions of the present statute. At the time of the rendition of the judgment the court ordered:
*87“The defendants [naming plaintiffs in error] are given ninety (90) days from the 2d day of May, 1903, to make and serve a case for the supreme court, and the plaintiff is given twenty (20) days after such service to suggest' amendments,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Scarborough v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
- State v. BeuermanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1898
- Baughman v. BaughmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
- Lantis v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899
- Kennedy v. HaskellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- State v. RumbleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
- Cardenas v. OrtizNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
- Eureka Bank v. BaySupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
- Bethany Hospital Co. v. PhilippiSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
- Fish v. PoormanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.