Legal Opinion
Ekedahl, Sharon v. Corestaff Inc
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided July 30, 1999No. 98-7119PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed PER CURIAM.
2Per curiam
A jury awarded plaintiff Sharon Eke-dahl $661,875 in a breach of contract action against defendant COREStaff, Inc. COR-EStaff challenges the district court’s denial of its motion for judgment as a matter of law, asserting that there was no stock options contract between the parties, both because there was no agreement on an essential term and because the alleged contract did not satisfy the Statute of Frauds. We conclude that there was no agreement on an essential term regarding the vesting of the stock options. We therefore reverse the judgment of the…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Edmund J. Flynn Co. v. LaVayDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- Jack Baker, Inc. v. Office Space Development Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Davis v. WinfieldDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Owen v. OwenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- Nofziger Communications, Inc., a District of Columbia Corporation v. Frederick P. Birks, as Trustee of the Wynmark TrustCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
4Cited by24 opinions
- Alexander v. Codemasters Group LimitedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Segar v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- Smith v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- Novecon Ltd. v. Bulgarian-American Enterprise FundCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
- Bailey v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.