Legal Opinion
Bailey v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided April 21, 2000No. 99-7103PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Chief Judge HARRY T. EDWARDS.
HARRY T. EDWARDS, Chief Judge:
The instant litigation involves a claim of employment discrimination filed by the ap-pellee, Emmanuel Bailey, against the appellant, Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae” or “employer”). In response to Mr. Bailey’s complaint, Fannie Mae filed a motion to stay litigation pending arbitration. The District Court denied the motion to stay, and Fannie Mae now appeals.
This case presents a new twist to an old problem. In Cole v. Burns Int’l Sec. Servs., 105 F.3d 1465 (D.C.Cir.1997), we held that,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Wright v. Universal Maritime Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Morrow v. Hallmark Cards, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2008
- Brown v. Dorsey & Whitney, LLP.District Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Booker v. Robert Half International, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Koly Camara v. Mastro's Restaurants LLCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2020
- DSMC, INC. v. Convera Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2002
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.