Widell v. Holy Trinity Catholic Church
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.
The preliminary skirmishes in the pleadings do not prevent this court from construing the complaint liberally to ascertain what the plaintiff intended to plead and to do “substantial justice between the parties.” Sec. 263.27, Stats. The plaintiff was ordered to plead his causes of action separately and he intended by the amended complaint to obtain the benefit of three causes of action while depriving the defendant of the benefits of a demurrer. The first cause of action alleging the facts of the accident and a violation of the safe-place statute, sec. 101.06, was incorporated into the third…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Holytz v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Kojis v. Doctors HospitalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- Hayes v. City of OshkoshWisconsin Supreme Court · 1873
- Plesko v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Harper v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Fitzgerald v. Meissner & Hicks, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Garcia v. HargroveWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- Jacque v. Steenberg Homes, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
- Doctor v. Pardue, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006
- Pagelsdorf v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.