Legal Opinion

Donnika Ivy v. Michael Williams

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 24, 2015No. 14-50037PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDITH BROWN CLEMENT, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiffs-appellees Donnika Ivy (“Ivy”) and the other named plaintiffs (collectively, the “named plaintiffs”) are deaf individuals who brought a putative class action against defendant-appellant Michael Williams in his official capacity as head of the Texas Education Agency (the “TEA”). They request injunctive and declaratory relief requiring the TEA to bring driver education into compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and Rehabilitation Act. The district court denied the TEA’s motion to dismiss but certified its order for immediate…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections v. YeskeySupreme Court of the United States · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mycal L. Ashby v. Warrick County School CorpCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  2. Campaign for Southern Equality v. Mississippi Department of Human ServicesDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2016
  3. Nat'l Ass'n of the Deaf v. Harvard Univ.District Court, District of Columbia · 2019
  4. Stephanie Price et al. v. Lori Shibinette, Commissioner of the New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2021
  5. Texas Workforce Commission v. United States Dept oCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API