Legal Opinion
Nat'l Ass'n of the Deaf v. Harvard Univ.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 28, 2019No. Case No. 3:15-cv-30023-KARPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The Second and Seventh Circuits have similarly interpreted Title III's general rule against disability discrimination as reaching beyond physical locations of public accommodations. In 1999, citing Carparts , the Second Circuit rejected the defendant insurance company's argument that Title III was only intended to ensure that the disabled have physical access to an insurance company's offices, not freedom from discrimination in its underwriting. The statute, the court held, "was meant to guarantee ... more than mere physical access." Pallozzi v. Allstate Life Ins. Co. , 198 F.3d 28, 32 (2d…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Gomez v. ToledoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Regional Rail Reorganization Act CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hartford Underwriters Insurance v. Union Planters Bank, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Doe v. MySpace, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- M.U. v. Team Illinois Hockey Club, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2022
- CALVIN CHANG v. TRIPADVISOR, LLC and AnotherMassachusetts Superior Court · 2022
- DENNIS v. MYLIFE.COM, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
- Duffer v. Nextdoor, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2023
- Henderson, Sr. v. The Source for Public Data, L.P.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2021
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.