Legal Opinion

Campaign for Southern Equality v. Mississippi Department of Human Services

District Court, S.D. Mississippi

Decided March 31, 2016No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:15cv578-DPJ-FKBPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Daniel P. Jordan III, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiffs seek a declaration that Mississippi Code section 93-17-3(5) — which prohibits adoption by married gay couples— violates the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the United States Constitution. They named as defendants the Mississippi Department of Human Services (“DHS”), DHS’s Executive Director, three chancery courts, nine chancellors from those three courts, and Mississippi’s Governor and Attorney General.

Defendants have offered a tepid defense of the statute itself, focusing instead on Plaintiffs’ right to sue them.…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  5. Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Doe v. HolcombCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  2. Jackson Women's Health Orgn v. Thomas DobbsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
  3. Fulton v. City of Phila.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. Jackson Women's Health Org. v. CurrierDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2018
  5. Doe v. AbbottDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2018

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API