In Re Gold & Silversmiths, Inc.
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
MICHAEL J. KAPLAN, Bankruptcy Judge.
In the case of In re Vecchio, 20 F.3d 555 (2d Cir.1994) (decided April 7, 1994), the Second Circuit Court of Appeals held that the bar date for claims set forth in Bankruptcy Rule 3002 is void as to priority claims in a Chapter 7 case because 11 U.S.C. § 726(a)(1) does not distinguish between timely filed priority claims and untimely priority claims.
Because Bankruptcy Rule 1019(6) was amended in 1991 to incorporate the provisions of Bankruptcy Rule 3002 into the procedure for the filing of administrative expense claims in a case converted…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ackermann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Robert James Lubben v. Selective Service System Local Board No. 27Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1972
- White v. HigginsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1940
- Reamer's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Joseph De Filippis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Christopher Covert v. LVNV Funding, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
- Rupert v. Krautheimer (In Re Krautheimer)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- In Re ChristieUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- In Re TuckerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994
- Ring ex rel. Bankruptcy for Swan v. Swan (In re Swan)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. New York · 2014