Joseph De Filippis v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SWYGERT, Circuit Judge.
The single issue in this appeal is whether the district court abused its discretion in denying defendant’s Rule 60(b) motion to vacate the permanent injunction entered against it. For the reasons set forth below, we find the district judge properly exercised his discretion, and therefore affirm the judgment.
This proceeding began on January 9,1974 when plaintiffs, members of the Marine Air Reserve, filed a complaint against the United States Marine Corps. Plaintiffs alleged that their constitutional rights were violated by defendant’s policy prohibiting reservists from…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ackermann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United States v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Klapprott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Kelley v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Robert James Lubben v. Selective Service System Local Board No. 27Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1972
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- Eduard Falk and Lettye M. Falk v. Sun Cha AllenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Twelve John Does v. District of Columbia Appeal of Edwin A. Meese, Iii, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- Werner v. CarboCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- Myron Batts v. Tow-Motor Forklift Company and Caterpillar, Inc., Caterpillar, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- Metlyn Realty Corp. v. Esmark, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.