Legal Opinion

Ayrhart v. Wilhelmy

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided July 3, 1907PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Carroll District Court.— Hon. Z. A. Churci-i, Judge. Action on a promissory note. Verdict and judgment for defendant, and ‘plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, C. J.

The petition of the plaintiff declares upon a promissory note alleged to have been executed by the *292defendant in the following form: “ Dedham, Iowa, Eeb. 13, 1903. For value received in certain harness goods and sundries, a list of which is hereto attached, amounting in value to $416.16, I promise to pay J. G. Catón the sum of $416.16, at various times as I sell the goods. Payments not to be made in sums less than $5. Payments to be endorsed hereon. H. Wilhelmy.” The defendant denies the genuineness of . the signature to the instrument, and denies that he ever executed or delivered the same,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Borland v. WalrathSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
  2. Whitaker v. ParkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  3. Browning v. GosnellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
  4. Hammond v. WolfSupreme Court of Iowa · 1889
  5. Ball v. SkinnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. BakerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
  2. State v. ManlySupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  3. Krieg v. GrantSupreme Court of Iowa · 1957
  4. Guy v. ViethTennessee Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Jolly v. DoolittleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API