Legal Opinion

Browning v. Gosnell

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 26, 1894PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal from Benton District Court. — Hon. John B. Caldwell, Judge. Action on a promissory note. Trial to a jury. Verdict and judgment for defendants. Plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtKinne, J.

I. This action was brought on a promissory note for two hundred dollars, dated April 17, 1880, and due October 17, 1880, bearing the signatures of appellees, and payable to .F. O. Gosnell or bearer. The suit was brought October 4, 1890, and an original notice issued, requiring defendants to appear at the January term, 1891, beginning on January 5, 1891. As shown by the officer’s return, this notice was duly served 'on all of the defendants. It appears without conflict, that the copy of the notice left with defendants Park and Gosnell by the officer cited them to appear and defend on or before…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Parkhill v. Town of BrightonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
  2. Allison v. C. & N. W. R. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1875
  3. Andrews v. Hayden's Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1889
  4. Ketchum v. WhiteSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
  5. Eureka Steam Heating Co. v. SlotemanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Wagner v. LucasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Doyle v. BurnsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  3. Adams v. RistineSupreme Court of Virginia · 1924
  4. State v. ManlySupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  5. Ayrhart v. WilhelmySupreme Court of Iowa · 1907

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API