Legal Opinion

People v. Fitzgibbon

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1998No. 83350; No.83790PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Freeman

In this consolidated appeal, we are asked to interpret Supreme Court Rule 604(d) (145 Ill. 2d R. 604(d)) so as to require appointed defense counsel to certify that he or she has reviewed the transcript from the original sentencing hearing prior to a hearing on a motion to reconsider sentence. For reasons that follow, we decline to interpret Rule 604(d) in such a manner.

BACKGROUND

Docket No. 83350

A Du Page County grand jury indicted defendant, Philip Fitzgibbon, for one count of residential burglary. On July 20, 1995, the circuit court, after admonishing defendant in accordance with Supreme…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. People v. WilkIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  3. People v. JanesIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  4. People v. WallaceIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  5. People v. JanesIllinois Supreme Court · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. JamisonIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
  2. People v. NorrisIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
  3. People v. LittleAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  4. People v. NealAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  5. People v. WhiteAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API