Legal Opinion

People v. Norris

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 2005No. 97231, 97816 cons.; 97272PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Freeman

Each of the defendants in these consolidated appeals was charged with Class A misdemeanor traffic offenses. The State sought to nol-pros the charges, which the circuit court of Will County allowed. The State later refiled the charges against each defendant. Each defendant moved to dismiss the new charges, citing Supreme Court Rule 505 (166 Ill. 2d R. 505). In each case, the motion was granted, and an appeal followed. In People v. Norris, Nos. 3—02—0841, 3—02—842, 3—02—0843, 3—02—0844, 3—02—0845, 3—02—0846, 3—02—0847, 3—02—0848, 3—02—0849, 3—02—0850, 3—02—0851, 3—02—0852, 3—02—0853, 3—02—0854,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Adams v. Northern Illinois Gas Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 2004
  2. The People v. WatsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1946
  3. People v. DrumIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
  4. People v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  5. People v. DeBlieckAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. People v. ArtisIllinois Supreme Court · 2009
  2. People v. HughesIllinois Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Vision Point of Sale, Inc. v. HaasIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
  4. People v. Denzel W.Illinois Supreme Court · 2010
  5. People v. ZiobroIllinois Supreme Court · 2011

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API