Legal Opinion

Bateman v. City of Grand Forks

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 2008No. 20070217PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] Suellen Bateman appeals from a district court judgment affirming a flood-control special assessment levied against her property. We conclude the district court did not err in concluding that the Special Assessment Commission did not abuse its discretion in apportioning the assessments and that the assessment on Bateman’s property was not arbitrary, capricious, or unreasonable. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] In 1997, the city of Grand Forks suffered from a devastating flood, which caused millions of dollars in damage to private and public property. As a result, a massive permanent…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Soo Line Railroad Company v. City of WiltonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Crampton v. City of Royal OakMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Quality Homes, Inc. v. Village of New BrightonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  4. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. City of Grand ForksNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Serenko v. City of WiltonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hector v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Hector v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  3. D & P Terminal, Inc. v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Hector v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Holter v. City of MandanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API