Legal Opinion

A. C. Lawrence Leather Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided November 24, 1948No. C. D. 1139PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cole, Judge:

■ Fifty-three bales of sheep skins from Peru were imported by plaintiff, a corporation engaged in converting raw skins and hides into leather. The merchandise was classified as wool on the skin under paragraph 1102 (b) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1001, par. 1102 (b)), and assessed with duty on the basis of a clean content of 23 per centum, at the rate of 32 cents per pound. Plaintiff claims the importation is free of duty either under paragraph 1765 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1201, par. 1765) as raw skins, not specially provided for, or under the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ayres, Bridges & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
  2. United States v. HeckmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  3. Domestic Broadtail Producers, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1939

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fred Whitaker Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
  2. Fairfield Wool Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  3. John Nieder Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950
  4. United States v. Fred Whitaker Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API