Legal Opinion

Fred Whitaker Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided September 26, 1951No. C. D. 1365PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cole, Judge:

Plaintiff, an importer arid processor of wool, entered at the port of Philadelphia a quantity of “Greasy Combing Wool 64’s,” which was classified under paragraph 1102 (b) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1001, par. 1102 (b)), as wool in the grease, not specially provided for, and assessed with duty at 34 cents per pound of clean content.

The collector’s classification and rate of duty are not disputed. The issue herein concerns, exclusively, the percentage of clean content. Assessment was based on 51.6 per centum of the returned net weight of the wool. Plaintiff claims 46…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Geo. S. Bush & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1949
  2. Gallagher v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  3. United States v. BennetCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1895
  4. A. C. Lawrence Leather Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1948
  5. United States v. HeckmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. A. W. Hilliard & Son, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  2. Abbot Worsted Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  3. Albert A. Schneider, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  4. American Express Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  5. American Express Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API