Legal Opinion

United States v. Heckman

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 13, 1911No. 89PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Transferred from United States Circuit Court for District of Massachusetts, Abstract 21120 (T. D. 29715).

1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge

The importation in question of raw Australian sheepskins with the wool on, was made at the port of Boston in 1908, and consists of two lots of skins, one containing 12 bales and the other 25 bales. The appraiser reported that on the 12-bale lot the wool was about an inch in length and on the 25-bale lot about three-quarters of an inch. These skins were assessed for duty by the collector under paragraph 360 of the tariff act of 1897 as “wools on the skin,” and were claimed by the importers to be entitled to free entry under paragraph 561 of the same act as “furs, undressed,” or under paragraph…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. G. Falk & BrotherSupreme Court of the United States · 1907

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fred Whitaker Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
  2. Ayres, Bridges & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
  3. A. C. Lawrence Leather Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1948
  4. United States v. Fred Whitaker Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API