Legal Opinion

Uhing v. City of Oakland

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided August 10, 1990No. 88-355PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.

This is an appeal from an order of the Burt County District Court granting partial injunctive relief, but refusing to order money damages. The plaintiffs appeal. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand with instructions.

On February 11, 1985, the plaintiffs, Clarence and Paul Uhing, filed an amended petition in the Burt County District Court, alleging that the defendant, the City of Oakland, Nebraska, in 1983 “wrongfully and unlawfully” altered one culvert and placed several others in such a way as to cause runoff water to drain onto and damage plaintiffs’ land. Plaintiffs sought a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gentry v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Armbruster v. Stanton-Pilger Drainage DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Patrick v. City of BellevueNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  4. City of Omaha v. MatthewsNebraska Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Kula v. PrososkiNebraska Supreme Court · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Spire v. Strawberries, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Romshek v. OsantowskiNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Dishman v. Nebraska Public Power DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Toulousaine de Distribution et de Services v. Tri-State Seed & GrainNebraska Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Barthel v. LiermannNebraska Court of Appeals · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API